Archived Posts

Posts Tagged ‘Performance Management’

Author Pic
March 10th, 2010

Addressing Subjective Aspects of Performance: Behaviors

Posted by Jamie Resker, Founder and President: Employee Performance Solutions. Jamie is recognized as an established thought leader and innovator in the area of performance management. She is the originator of the Performance Continuum Feedback Method®, a tool for systematically diagnosing employee performance issues and development opportunities and crafting messages about even the most sensitive behavior based issues.

0 comments

Many managers are adept at initiating conversations about the objective parts of performance, but nearly most dread initiating conversations about personal issues such as behaviors and attitudes.

The traditional method by which they are taught to provide performance feedback to employees, sometimes referred to as “constructive criticism,” is often the very reason they avoid giving feedback in the first place.

That kind of feedback is typically framed as: problem, examples of shortcomings and negative impact. Inherent limitations with this kind of communication frequently manifest themselves as follows:

  • From the employee’s perspective this information comes across as finger pointing, fault finding and disciplinary. Typical outcome: Defensive reaction
  • Most of us avoid conflict like the plague. Who wants to be on the other side of dealing with the employee’s defensive reaction?

So what can managers do about it? How can they create talking points that are honest, not watered down yet hearable and sayable?

Understanding uncensored perceptions is the key. These are the real feelings about a person or circumstance, which would be inappropriate to share in their raw form. “He’s so high-maintenance”, “She’s a slacker” and “he inundates people with too much information” are examples of feelings managers might have but are appropriately unwilling to share.

Censoring some perceptions is probably a good thing, yet most often the manager simply won’t say anything at all. The person who should be receiving feedback misses out on the opportunity to gain some awareness around a key issue.

If you are a manager experiencing this sort of problem, try taking your negative thought and translating it into language that describes the exact opposite. The result should be talking in terms of what you want to have happen as opposed to talking about the problem behavior or performance.

Here are some examples of negative thoughts translated into “develop the ability to” statements:

Negative thought Develop the ability to:
Excuse Expert Put your energy into identifying solutions
Doesn’t take responsibility Take ownership of (fill in the blank)
Too conciliatory Defend your positions
No desire to learn on their own Take the initiative to add to your job knowledge
Condescending to those who are less experienced Use your experience and knowledge to mentor those with less experience

The lesson here is to frame performance issues as future-focused thought that describes what the performance could and should be. The statements above are just the beginning of the conversation, you’ll need to explain in detail what you mean by “Use your experience and knowledge to mentor those with less experience.” You’ll need to reach agreement with the employee on what the associated actions will be in order to meet the performance objective.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Author Pic
February 10th, 2010

Rethinking the “Focal” Performance Review

Posted by Beth Steinberg, Beth Steinberg has more than 17 years of human resources experience helping leaders and companies (emerging to Fortune 500) with complex organizational and growth issues. She is currently an Organization Development Consultant living in Silicon Valley.

0 comments

Most companies I have worked for and worked with have a “focal” performance review process.  This process is typically one review per year, completed by the manager with or without some sort of 360 review process.  While some managers really take the process seriously and work hard to write a comprehensive review, many managers, especially with large teams, struggle to find the time to write meaningful reviews.  The end result can be a process that is stressful to both the employee and the manager with less than positive outcomes.  The focus can be on the areas of improvement and what the compensation increase is, rather than achievement and development.

There hasn’t been a lot of new thinking on this subject until very recently. Several thought leaders including Stanford’s Jeffrey Pfeffer in his Business Week article, and Marshall Goldsmith in his coaching work, have sparked an interest in looking at new ways to manage performance and more importantly, increase manager/employee interaction, employee development as well as overall employee performance and satisfaction.

The key is to make it a part of the culture and every day management instead of a “separate” activity done annually. The process also needs to have shared ownership with the employee. The focus needs to be on frequent reciprocal feedback and dialogue versus annual or semi-annual one-way feedback.

Old Thinking New Thinking
Annual process Ongoing, continuous process
Manager Driven Employee Driven
Fear based Development based
Time consuming Part of everyday management
Arduous Meaningful, part of culture
Focus on compensation Focus on building organizational capabilities

Whatever performance review process your company uses, you can find ways to incorporate “new thinking” into your every day management. An easy place to start is to focus on meaningful 1:1’s with your team. They can be an incredible way to build trust, get and give feedback, and brainstorm on new ideas and new ways to work. Ask each person on your team to think about what they want from their 1:1’s. You can work with each person on your team to try to make 1:1 time as meaningful and productive as possible.

As a people leader, the most important part of your role is leading and developing your team. Finding the balance between the day to day work and leading can be a challenge. The more you develop and engage your team, the more you should be able to take off your own plate. Focusing on your team will make your job (and maybe even your life) much more meaningful and impactful.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Author Pic
February 9th, 2010

5 Things Supervisors Can Do to Manage Performance

Posted by Lisa Rosendahl, Lisa is a Human Resource (HR) leader with over 15 years of professional HR experience in public, private and government organizations. She brings a unique, common sense perspective to the business of HR and is the author of Simply Lisa, a blog about Leadership, Growth and Human Resources.

0 comments

If you are a supervisor, you’ve lamented at one time or another, “why do I have to manage performance?” I know you have. I don’t think there is a supervisor  out there who hasn’t, myself included.  So, why do you have to manage performance? Well, it’s your job.

The best and most effective supervisors address performance willingly. This is more than a willingness to fire an employee, it’s recognizing employee needs for training early, distinguishing what can and cannot be trained, and provide assistance to employees, as is practical.

Just because a supervisor is willing to address performance, doesn’t make it easy. Here are 5 things that can help:

  • Develop, communicate and issue performance standards that include key, critical elements of the position, are based on objective criteria, and reasonably inform the employee of what’s expected.
  • Incorporate performance discussions as a regular part of business. Have candid, forthright dialogue, provide constructive, respectful feedback, and apply the same standards equally to all.
  • Intervene as soon as an issue arises.  Do not wait for the situation to worsen, hope it goes away or wait for the straw that breaks the camel’s back. Be data driven, job-based and factual.
  • Check your ego at the door. This is not about you. Address all issues raised by the employee. Be committed to a successful outcome and frame your conversations with this in mind.
  • Hire Smart. Do a thorough job assessment to identify the skills required for success in the position, interview to assess those skills, and do your homework by thoroughly checking references.

Performance management, done right, can be a very rewarding part of a supervisor’s job.

Tags: , , ,

Author Pic
February 1st, 2010

Corporate Cultures Must Encourage Productive Feedback

Posted by Jamie Resker, Founder and President: Employee Performance Solutions. Jamie is recognized as an established thought leader and innovator in the area of performance management. She is the originator of the Performance Continuum Feedback Method®, a tool for systematically diagnosing employee performance issues and development opportunities and crafting messages about even the most sensitive behavior based issues.

1 comment

People are really good at making excuses for not giving feedback. “We’re really nice at XYZ organization” or “we avoid conflict and causing people to feel badly about themselves” are the justifications we most commonly hear. Translation: it’s just easier to let the under performance continue as is; I’ll just focus on my A and B level players.

There are many reasons for not having performance conversations:

  • He’s only got another two years before retirement.
  • She can’t change.
  • That’s the way he’s always been.
  • What if I make things worse?
  • It’s a personality issue and it’s not my job to deal with that type of thing.
  • We can’t afford to lose her.
  • The most contradictory of all: “We’re a gentle, nice type of place to work and we avoid conflict”.

A Human Resources Director of a Boston based technology company had a manager ask for assistance to move an under performing employee out of the company. When the HR Director asked the manager when he had a conversation with the employee about the issue, he admitted he hadn’t brought it up with them. She then asked point blank: “So you’d rather fire this person than try to have a conversation about changing the behavior? (See my paper How to Address Employee Behavior Issues) Sadly the manager answered, “Yes, I’d rather just get rid of the person”.

This is an unfortunately common story in many organizations. So, if the organization was really the nice place it claimed to be wouldn’t it make more sense to provide early-on and actionable feedback that would help the employee get back on track?

Good and kind organizations promote these conversations early on before the issue has reached the point of no return. From the employee’s perspective it’s particularly unfair when the issue is in their blind spot. They have no idea their performance is problematic, not because the leader who should be having a conversation is unaware of the issue, but unsure of how to go about the conversation. On the surface this appears to be the “we’re a nice organization who doesn’t engage in conflict”.

What can you do?

What if you work for an organization that is kind and shies away from giving feedback for fear of “upsetting people”? Don’t wait for someone to wave their magic wand and give you the feedback. You could be waiting a very long time. I hate to say it, but assume that there’s information that people are aware of but just aren’t going to tell you about. We all have blind spots; do you know about yours? Be the initiator of gathering important developmental information. Tap into your network of trusted advisors and ask the one thing questions:

  1. Tell me one thing I’m doing well that I should continue with (after all it’s just as important to know what we’re doing well and should continue with).
  2. Tell me one thing that would help me be more effective? (notice I’m not asking for a commentary on a weakness; I want the person I’m asking to think forward about something I can take action on in the future)

Being a kind organization means giving people the opportunity to improve, even when it might mean initiating an uncomfortable conversation. The goal should always be to “help the employee out” before “helping them out of the organization”.

Tags: , , ,

Author Pic
January 22nd, 2010

Performance Management for Changing Times

Posted by Phil Wylie, Phil Wylie is a learning & development professional who specializes in improving personal and organizational effectiveness. He is currently Manager of Talent Development at SickKids Foundation in Toronto

0 comments

Change is happening faster then ever. Advances in technology, innovations and paradigm shifting ideas are spreading at an astounding pace. What was new yesterday, is best practice today, and out of date tomorrow. Businesses must remain nimble and fast.

Performance management is one process that managers must look at changing in order to meet new needs. Traditional performance management systems typically include setting goals on an annual basis, reviewing them once or twice a year, and a final end of year review. Consider some of the following challenges to this structure:

  • Shifting strategies: Setting year long goals in an environment where strategy can shift on a monthly basis.
  • Infrequent reviews: Waiting to review performance at 6 month intervals, when projects can have week long life spans.
  • Staff Turnover: Holding annual performance reviews, when staff turnover can lead to newly appointed managers assessing staff they’ve only supervised for a short period of time.

How can we adapt our performance management systems so that they can keep up with the pace of change?

One way is to do everything you do in your performance management process more frequently.

  • Set shorter term goals and change them more often. This doesn’t mean you should abandon your long term strategic plan (though you should be reviewing that more frequently as well), but a focus on shorter term goals will ensure that goals are aligned to whatever priorities are most important.
  • Give and get feedback more often. Getting constructive feedback is the best way to improve. Employees need more feedback to develop their skills, learn from their mistakes, celebrate their successes, and improve their performance. Provide feedback immediately after projects are completed, so that the receiver can reflect upon their performance while it is still fresh in their mind. Look to gather feedback from multiple sources, so that in the event of staff turnover (such as a new manager) there are multiple inputs towards assessing someone’s performance.
  • Review performance more frequently. Take the time to meet with your staff on a more regular basis to talk about what they are learning, how things are going and what they need from you. Because of faster changing goals and priorities, this becomes even more important than ever to ensure that you are keeping your employees engaged and on track.

The good news is that it doesn’t necessarily mean more work. If you do these three things more frequently, the time it takes to do them becomes much shorter. Rather then day long retreats to set goals, days working with office doors closed, carefully constructing performance appraisals, and weeks wasted delivering year end performance reviews- look for bi-weekly or monthly 15 minute status updates, where you set goals, review feedback, and talk about performance.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Author Pic
January 21st, 2010

Go Social, Get Results

Posted by Jesse Goldman, Business Development

0 comments

We’re thrilled to be featured on the Dachis Group blog. Here’s a little excerpt from my post:

Top performers need to learn quickly to advance their careers. It’s no longer acceptable to wait for our next performance review, often months away, to get critical insights on how we can improve. Managers often forget about important advice and it’s usually too late to do anything concrete about what we do hear!

We need constructive feedback and coaching much more frequently to excel in today’s fast-paced business environments. A quick comment or simple kudo, such as Nice job!, can be just as valuable as more thorough advice on what we can do to improve.

Read the rest of Go Social, Get Results on the Dachis Group blog.

Tags: , , , ,

Author Pic
January 18th, 2010

One on one conversations: a must have

Posted by Nathaniel Rottenberg, Community Marketing

1 comment

Regular one on one conversations between manager and employee are crucial. These conversations align both employee and manager helping to ensure that project goals are achieved and everyone knows where to focus their efforts.

Not only are regular one on one conversations important for the success of the business, they are crucial for ensuring job satisfaction. Regular one on one conversations eliminate that ‘lost’ feeling and make sure an employees efforts are focused and appreciated. Think of them as mini coaching sessions to help an employee understand their weaknesses, concerns, and focus their efforts.

Andy Houghton’s BusinessWeek article, Performance Reviews: It’s about ‘How’, Not ‘Why’, offers some excellent tips for managers on how to conduct productive conversations and increase an employees performance.

Through such conversations, the manager gets an understanding of what lies behind the employee’s performance, what energizes the employee, and how the employee can be best used

Do you meet with your manager regularly to discuss performance? What techniques do you use to ensure your employees are focused and motivated?

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Author Pic
January 4th, 2010

Define your Objectives for 2010

Posted by Nathaniel Rottenberg, Community Marketing

1 comment

Have you defined your businesses’ objectives and goals for 2010? If you haven’t, you’re not alone:

In the survey of more than 2,100 working people conducted by YouGov, only 24 per cent said that their employer had clearly articulated their 2010 objectives to the workforce, while a third (32 per cent) even doubted there was a plan for their business at all.

First step of performance management: make sure your employees clearly understand the direction of the business. How can an employee be productive if she doesn’t know where to focus her efforts? Clearly defined company goals increases motivation and engagement. Having motivated and engaged employees will increase the performance of your business.

If employer actions raise engagement by just 10 per cent, they could typically increase profits by up to £1,500 per employee per year.

How do you keep your employees engaged? Do you know the company goals and objectives for 2010? Check out Employers fail to communicate business plans to learn more.

Tags: , , , , , , ,