Archived Posts

Posts Tagged ‘professional development’

Author Pic
December 10th, 2009

Life after feedback: 2 things you should do now!

Posted by David Priemer, Product & Community

0 comments

So you followed the 4 East Steps to Getting Started with Rypple and you got some insights from your crowd. Fantastic! Now what?

In my latest video blog I talk about the two things you should do next :

  1. Follow up: seek clarification & engage your audience
  2. Take action: tell your crowd what you’re going to do with their insights

Tip: the second one is hands down THE most important thing you can do with your feedback, so don’t forget to do it!

Enjoy!

Tags: , , , , ,

Author Pic
December 8th, 2009

4 Easy steps to getting started with Rypple

Posted by David Priemer, Product & Community

0 comments

People ask me, “what’s the easiest way for me to get started with Rypple?”.

Here are four super-easy tips to help get you going:

  1. Get insights from YOUR Crowd
  2. Give insights
  3. Get feedback on “one thing”
  4. Take action!

1. Get insights from YOUR Crowd

We all work with colleagues, clients, mentors, and friends who have insights on how we can take our game to the next level. The problem is, we rarely ask these people to share their thoughts so these helpful insights remain hidden. As John Foster from IDEO discusses in a recent blog, tapping into those insights and making yourself open to them is the best way to get started down the road to continuous improvement.

Action: login to Rypple and create a group of advisers (left hand side of screen). Rypple will periodically remind them to share their insights on how you’re doing, resulting in a continuous stream of great ideas designed especially for you!

Screenshot of setting up a group
Click to enlarge

2. Give insights

You probably have lots of thoughts on how the people and processes you deal with every day can be improved. Don’t keep them bottled up! Use Rypple to share them with a friend, colleague, or manager quickly and anonymously right from your email account.

Action: Send an email to give@rypple.com. Put the recipients’ email addresses in the subject line and your feedback in the body of the message. Hit send and your anonymous feedback will be on it way! Learn more about give@rypple.com. (Tip: give feedback anytime by trying this from your mobile device)

Give_sm
Click to enlarge

3. Get feedback on “one thing”

The best way to learn fast and get ahead quicker is to reach out and ask the people around you for feedback. The trick is uncovering your personal blind-spots and asking super-focused questions that expose them and yield actionable insights. That’s why using the “one thing” technique is so powerful!

Action: In Rypple, click on the group you create in step 1 and ask them a question starting with the phrase, “What’s one thing….” (e.g. “What’s one thing I can do to be a more effective manager?” or “What’s one thing we can do to improve the value of our weekly meetings?”).

Screenshot of asking a question
Click to enlarge

4. Take Action!

Want to know a secret? The most helpful feedback is the world is totally useless unless you use it to take action and drive yourself forward! In fact, the key is not only taking action, but letting the people around you know about it. In one of his studies (pgs 6-7), leadership coach/guru Marshall Goldsmith talks about the importance of follow-up to drive engagement. Think about it. If people see you’re using their feedback to improve, not only will your stock increase in value, but they’ll be more likely to provide it again!

Action: Once you’ve received feedback from step 3, click the “Take Action” button below the results and let your crowd know what action you plan on taking. Rypple will send a notification back to your advisers, demonstrating the value of their help!

Screenshot of take action control
Click to enlarge

Tags: , , , , ,

Author Pic
November 25th, 2009

Ready for the feedback journey?

Posted by Jesse Goldman, Business Development

0 comments

Last week we hosted the second meeting of the Rypple Learning Collaborative. Spearheaded by John Foster, IDEO’s Head of Talent and Organization, we spent an exciting afternoon at Pixar’s headquarters together with nearly 40 innovators and thought leaders from top organizations and academic institutions, including Mozilla, Facebook, and Stanford University.

guys_at_pixar1

From left to right: Jesse Goldman, Daniel Debow, Sully, David Stein, David Priemer, Mike, Jay Goldman

One topic that resonated with me was the idea that feedback is a journey, not a specific event. The feedback we ask for, and get, will evolve as we develop and as our priorities change.

My insight: people are more effective in reaching their objectives when they get ongoing feedback based on their work and goals.

Why? Because when feedback is part of our day-to-day lives, we get used to receiving it. This puts us in a better position to act on the feedback because we become less distracted by its implications.

Most of us are constantly on the look-out for indicators to let us know how we’re doing at work. If we’re not used to regularly getting feedback from our peers, bosses, etc., we’re more likely to think to deeply about the meaning of each piece of feedback we get. We end up spending more time interpreting the input, discussing with our friends, etc., than we do actually acting on it and using it to get better and help drive results.

Infrequent feedback is a big distraction. Consider the annual performance review, for example. Why is it so stressful for so many of us? Because annual appraisals force us to squeeze as much information as we can remember into a single event each year. Due to its infrequency, the appraisal event becomes the indicator of our value to the company. That’s challenging to take in all at once, and particularly unpleasant if we disagree with the assessment. We’ve got to break this habit – we’ll all be better, and happier, if we do.

Fostering a journey of continuous feedback requires an understanding that each piece of feedback received is not in itself the sole reflection of how good or bad you are. That’s a big step for most (myself included), but we need to do our best to keep this rule in mind: creating a habit of regular feedback will make us more receptive to feedback. This is how to start a journey that will be more fruitful for you, your team, and your organization.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Author Pic
October 22nd, 2009

Gazing through my Johari Window

Posted by Jay Goldman, Jay has been providing a human side to technology for over ten years, as a technologist, user experience specialist, and visual designer. Jay is the author of The Facebook Cookbook for O’Reilly Media.

0 comments

This is part two in the Johari Windows posts, covering the results of the experiment. You should start with Check Your Blind Spot: Rypple and the Johari Window to get the context for this second half.

So! You’re probably wondering how it all went down. Well let me tell you! It’s no easy task whittling down a list of 56 adjectives into a shopping list of self-selected descriptors. My six advisers selected a total set of 19 adjectives, which I’ve listed as a tag cloud to show their relative weights:

Able, Adaptable, Calm, Cheerful, Clever, Confident, Energetic, Extroverted, Friendly, Happy, Helpful, Idealistic, Intelligent, Kind, Knowledgeable, Relaxed, Responsive, Self-Assertive, Witty

I picked six adjectives to describe myself: bold, caring, clever, friendly, happy, witty.

Here are the full set of results plotted into the Johari quadrants:

Johari Window Results

Johari Window Results

Here’s what I learned:

  • The Johari list is almost entirely ‘positive’ words. Sometimes positivity is in the eye of the beholder. Is being complex a good thing? My meaning of it might be entirely different from yours. The few generally negative terms are nervous, self-conscious, and tense, though I’d argue that you could probably include introverted and idealistic. Also worth noting: this makes it impossible to write this post without sounding insufferably conceited. (I only used to be insufferably conceited – now I’m perfect. Ha!).
  • A number of the terms are very closely related. It can be hard to decide between things like friendly and extroverted or cheerful and happy. They aren’t exactly the same but there really isn’t space for both of them in a short list of six terms. More on this below.
  • Our team rocks the response rate. I sent the request for feedback to all 16 of my fellow Rypplers and I got 10 responses, which is a 63% rate. Four of my advisers took advantage of the “Nothing to add” link, giving me real responses from six of my colleagues. That’s really impressive considering that the task required a fair bit of time to complete.
  • Make sure your advisers know if you’re going to blog the results. Even though Rypple will never reveal their identity to you, it’s only fair that you disclose your intentions in advance so they know what they’re getting into.
  • Kaizen: would be a stronger exercise if you included the Nohari list. The Nohari list is made up of negative antonyms of the original, positive terms, so including it would give a more balanced perspective.
  • Kaizen: asking exclusively work colleagues gives a slanted perspective. Although we spend more time with them than anyone else, including only your teammates doesn’t excludes the more personal perspectives of friends and family.

Checking the Blind Spots

As stated in the previous post, this exercise was all about checking my blind spots. Here’s what I found:

  • A few of the Blind Spots were actually on my short list but I had to choose between them and their almost-synonyms (e.g.: I picked friendly over extroverted). The near synonyms are valid blind spots by the letter of the Johari law but not really by the spirit of it.
  • Only two of the Blind Spots are actually surprising to me: calm and kind. Although it’s definitely nice to be thought of as calm, I would describe myself as being more at the excitable end of the spectrum. And it’s not that I don’t think of myself as kind, but rather that I would never have thought it to be such a defining characteristic that it made my top six.
  • You’ll also note that idealistic made it in there, leaving me wondering if it was meant in the good “stands up for his beliefs!” or bad “One whose conduct is influenced by ideals that often conflict with practical considerations” sense. Luckily, Rypple has an awesome Comment on Feedback feature that let me ask my anonymous adviser which sense they meant. He or she replied “In the positive (in most circumstances. But in some circumstances, a loosening of the “idealistic” standard would be helpful).” That’s the most useful thing I learned about myself and confirms something I sort of knew already: standing by your ideals is important but it’s more important to pick your battles wisely.

This was a really useful exercise for me and I highly recommend it. Well worth the roughly 30 minutes I’ve invested to date in asking the question and analyzing the results. Another win for Rypple!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Author Pic
October 20th, 2009

A Simple Technique to Get Positive Feedback

Posted by Jamie Resker, Founder and President: Employee Performance Solutions. Jamie is recognized as an established thought leader and innovator in the area of performance management. She is the originator of the Performance Continuum Feedback Method®, a tool for systematically diagnosing employee performance issues and development opportunities and crafting messages about even the most sensitive behavior based issues.

0 comments

How many times do we hear general feedback comments such as:

“That was a great presentation”

“I liked how you handled that customer issue”

“The sales call went really well”

These type of comments might make me feel good for about 5 minutes, but it doesn’t tell me specifically what worked and why.  When I understand what it was that worked I will know to weave those same ingredients into future work.

The person who gave the positive feedback does have more information but you’ll need to draw it out.

Here’s how: The next time someone gives you some general feedback such as, “That was a great report” you should immediately say,”Thanks for the feedback, what did you like about it?”

What you’ll hear are thoughtful details such as “Well, it was helpful that you first presented x, y and z.  The graphics describing the current situation were spot on and the way you wrapped it up by tying in xyz really hit home.”

Now that’s meaningful feedback because you get the particulars on what worked well and why.  You can then repeat those same things for future and confidently continue to build upon past  successes.  So, the next time you receive well intentioned yet non-specific feedback follow it up by asking, “What Did You Like About It”.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Author Pic
October 13th, 2009

A Younger Perspective

Posted by Nathaniel Rottenberg, Community Marketing

0 comments

Rules for Managing Gen Y is a profile of Alexander Younger, the founder and president of Toronto-based marketing communications firm Design Lab, and Jason Blessing, group vice-president and general manager of the Taleo small and medium business segment. According to the article, Gen Ys want to get involved, get frequent feedback, see the results of their work, and work in a team. As a Gen Y I thought that I’d share my thoughts.

The younger generation wants to know what’s going to happen; they want to feel in charge of their future and a significant part of everything the company is doing even though they may not have the experience to understand it’s not always feasible to have your hand in all those pies. — Alexander Younger

We’ve grown up with the internet, which gives us the ability to learn about anything we’re interested in very quickly. And we’re used to it being that way! So I do want to know about everything that is happening with the business. I get that it isn’t always possible for me to be up to speed on all of our activities. Managers: all you have to say, “this isn’t the right time for you to participate, but you’re learning and you’ll be ready soon.” Positive feedback.

Historically, performance reviews were viewed as an annual occurrence that everybody dreaded. That might be acceptable for older generations but younger generations absolutely expect that to be a more frequent process. It’s a process that engages them in the business. — Jason Blessing

Maybe we don’t understand how flawed the system is (infrequent, tied to salary and promotion, not really about personal development) because we’ve never experienced it.

We think a performance review is a chance to sit with the manager and find out what we’ve done well and what needs work. Seems like a no brainer that everyone would want this as often as possible. We simply want to know how we are doing so we can do better.

Younger workers expect to have a direct line of sight between their work and corporate goals. –Mary Teresa Bitti

Yes we do. I’m young, and have relatively few responsibilities which means I can choose what I want to do. In fact, most of my friends are traveling the world. I don’t want to be doing work that isn’t contributing to driving the business forward. And if it isn’t obvious, tell your Gen Y how their work will do so. I joined to help and contribute, and if I’m not doing that than I’m out. Bon voyage.

Younger workers tend to prefer to work in teams. — Mary Teresa Bitti

At school, working in a group meant safety in numbers a.k.a  a lower chance of failing. You could always count on the genius in your group to figure it out!

Owning a project is a scary feeling. But remember, if you don’t try you’ve already failed. And if you fail, and you will, you’ll learn. Not so terrible really.

Gen Y’s do you agree? Managers, does this give you a little more insight into our young and inexperienced minds? Read the rest of the interview at the financialpost.com

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Author Pic
October 7th, 2009

Learning by following up and encouraging honesty

Posted by George Babu, Corporate Development & IP

0 comments

It goes without saying that learning, in all its many forms, is the key to staying ahead. Learning what’s working, what’s not, how to fix things, and so on. In a classic HBR article from 1994 titled “Good Communication that Blocks Learning“, Chris Argyris provides some ideas on how people within organizations can learn more effectively. He shows how “double-loop learning” (where you ask follow up questions to get at what lies beneath the surface) is a better way to learn, and how “good” communication (not being entirely honest in the interests of being polite or not rocking the boat) gets in the way (despite it generally being well-meaning)! In addition to getting into the habit of asking followup questions, and encouraging honest responses, you can also use Rypple to help you ask followup questions, and help your team provide you with honest responses.

Chris first wrote about double-loop learning in the mid-seventies. He’d observed how people within companies typically engage in single-loop learning, where they’d ask one dimensional questions to uncover one dimensional answers. Rarely did people probe beneath the surface with followup questions to uncover the reasons, motives, and so on. His favourite example is that of a thermostat which simply asks, “Are we at the preset temperature?” (single loop learning), and never asks the followup questions, “What is the appropriate temperature?” “Are we using the right source?”, “Are we adjusting in the right way?” and so on.

An example of single v. double loop learning in a software development process. Let’s say that your team decides to “clean up” your app, does some extensive testing, discovers a series of bugs, comes up with fixes, and implements the fixes. If you stop here, satisfied with the newly fixed code, then you’ve demonstrated single-loop learning. If you then dig deeper and ask, “Why did these bugs occur?” “Are the tests the right tests?” “Are we setting out to test in the right way?” and so on, then you’ve demonstrated double-loop learning. The former is good enough, but the latter is what helps you leap-frog the competition. If you’re only ever asking the former question, then problems may fester for far too long, and be more expensive or difficult to fix down the road.

However, double-loop learning does not always occur within teams. Why? Chris says there’s a social and a psychological reason for this. Socially, most of us hate to be the one that opens Pandora’s Box, rocks the boat, or comes across as negative. Instead, we’re encouraged to think positively, motivate others, be considerate of others’ feelings, etc. While being positive is great, in some situations, it can dramatically hurt your team. The psychological reason that blocks double-loop learning is that whenever a problem involves a threat or embarrassment, we take of our objective/rigorous reasoning hat, and instead engage in defensive reasoning – essentially justifying our actions or blaming others, rather than objectively looking at problems and solutions.

So next time you face a problem, don’t be afraid to dig deeper. The problem you face may just be a symptom of deeper problems. Ask followup questions.

And encourage those around you to be honest. Let them know that you’re not going to hold it against them for being honest. If your team is hesitant to be entirely honest for fear of not being polite/considerate/rocking the boat/you name it, try using Rypple to gather anonymous responses from your team (and of course, once you get feedback, ask follow up questions). People tend to be honest when they use Rypple since the anonymity helps people avoid being seen as too negative or as rocking the boat. And since the feedback can only be seen by the person asking the question, there is less embarrassment involved. We’ve also seen another benefit in several companies. Teams that start using Rypple find that people feel more comfortable giving honest face-to-face feedback! And when that happens, then you can be sure that you and your team will be learning a lot more effectively than before.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Author Pic
September 29th, 2009

Check Your Blind Spot: Rypple and the Johari Window

Posted by Jay Goldman, Jay has been providing a human side to technology for over ten years, as a technologist, user experience specialist, and visual designer. Jay is the author of The Facebook Cookbook for O’Reilly Media.

0 comments

This is part one in the Johari Windows posts. You should start here and then read the follow-up Gazing through my Johari Window for the results of the exercise.

Those of you who took any psychology courses in university probably remember needing to have someone wrench you from the depths of a self-induced  self-diagnosis abyss. I clearly remember paging through my Psych 101 textbook and becoming increasingly anxious with each turned page as I realized that I was suffering from an unbelievable combination of manic depression, multiple personality disorder, ADD, sociopathic tendencies, and a litany of other debilitating disorders. If you were looking for me by the end of the semester, you would have found me curled in the fetal position under my desk, crying and breathing shallowly into a paper bag.

Which brings us to the most important thing I learned in that class: self-diagnosis is useless. There’s a good reason your doctor rolls her eyes when you walk in with a sheaf of ‘medical’ information from the Internets, ranting and raving about how you’ve only got a few minutes to live. It’s the same reason that we all need feedback from our colleagues, clients, and mentors to properly understand our own performance. Marshall Goldsmith, renown executive coach, wrote an excellent book about the value of feedback called What Got You Here Won’t Get You There. Among many, many other excellent points, Marshall has this to say on the topic of self-diagnosis:

For one thing, I’m a little skeptical of self-diagnosis. Just as people tend to overestimate their strengths, they also tend to overrate their weaknesses. They think they’re really bad at something at which they’re only mediocre or slightly poor — an F when they’re really a C minus. In other words, they see cancer where a professional would see a muscle pull.

The book obviously has a lot to say about feedback, which is where it gets really interesting for us. Section three (How We Can Change for the Better) starts off with a description of Johari Windows:

Psychologists have all sorts of schemata to explain us to ourselves. One of the more interesting ones is a simple four-pane grid known as the Johari Window (named after two real characters, Joe and Harry). It divides our self-awareness into four parts, based on what is known and unknown about us to other people and what is known and unknown about us to ourselves.

Turns out that Johari Windows were created by Joseph Luft and Harry Ingham back in 1955 to help people better understand their interpersonal communication and relationships (more info). The window is divided into four panes — or rooms — as follows:

Johari Window

Johari Window

The actual exercise is conducted by giving the subject a list of 55 adjectives (e.g.: bold, dependable, ingenious — see the full list) and asking him or her to pick five that describe themselves. Their peers are then given the same list and asked to pick the same number of adjectives to describe the subject. The resulting set of words is then plotted onto the grid, with shared adjectives in Public, asker-only ones in Private, and peer-only ones in Blind Spots.

Blind Spots (the circled pane) is the most interesting one and the premise that Rypple is built on. The people around you — your colleagues and clients, your family and friends — know things about you that you don’t know and those things may be holding you back. Think about how powerful the knowledge in the Blind Spots box really is and about how much more successful it would make you to tap into it (not necessarily in the monetary sense). A small sample of the kinds of things you can learn:

  • From your team: your real value as a team member or leader. The ways you could be a better contributor and your team could be more efficient and productive. The things you already do well and don’t realize make a difference.
  • From your clients: real visibility into the status of your accounts. Honest assessments of your sales staff. Real understanding of competitors and opportunities.
  • From friends, family, coworkers: the annoying habits you have and don’t know about. The ways in which you could be a better friend, spouse, or parent. The strengths you may not know you posses or ways in which you’re hard on yourself when other people aren’t.

Those are just a few examples to give a sense of the possibilities. I’m sure you have no trouble thinking of things you’d like to know!

The Great Rypple Johari Experiment

I was inspired by this new found knowledge and decided to conduct a little experiment. I’ve sent a Rypple to the whole team and asked them to visit the Wikipedia page and choose six adjectives that describe me, and I’m doing the same while I wait for their responses. I’ll plot out what comes back to build my grid and will report back on the results as soon as I have them.

Results are up! Check out the follow-up Gazing through my Johari Window for more Johari goodness.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Author Pic
September 23rd, 2009

Being Bold

Posted by Daniel Debow, Co-CEO

2 comments

We’ll be bold if you’ll be.  We’re talkin’ to you, HR Technology Conference attendees…

This week, we’re prepping for HR Tech. Bill Kutik, the uber-analyst,  has selected Rypple as a “cool new technology” for the show.  Sweet!  We get to demonstrate Rypple in front of a large audience.

But, we feel a bit strange about it. You see…. the magic demo can be fraught with danger, the place where your moral compass as a vendor can get warped. Demos and other heavy forms of “push” marketing are optimized to convince buyers why their solution “could be” useful.

That’s not why we started Rypple. We wanted to be bold and build a service that real people want to use and actually find useful.  So, we’ve created a consumer oriented  product for people who happen to work in the “enterprise”.  This reduces training costs for our clients and means that our primary marketing is user recommendations.

It’s all part of a bold business model, called “Freemium“: free for many, subscription for some.   Aaron Levie, the CEO of Box.net, described Freemium’s benefits best:

[Freemium means]…if the product doesn’t solve [the actual users'] problem, they move on to something else. This forces you to create better, more usable products, and not simply build your business on aggressive and costly marketing and sales. This also means your product has to rock… If you’re not, Free users will leave and the rest certainly will never pay.

This approach has worked well. CEOs, trainers, project leaders, doctors, professors, and executives have found that Rypple delivers real results for them, their teams, and their companies.  Amazing evangelists, like John Foster, the Chief Talent Officer at IDEO,  are collaborating with other users to help us make Rypple rock even more.  And, of course, free users are converting to pay users.

Next week, we’ll be spending time with lots of HR professionals at HR Tech.  These are great, hard-working people typically responsible for tens of thousands of employees and many complex systems.  They are used to the dog-and-pony-shows of buying and deploying [gulp] Enterprise Software for others.  It can be painful and we sympathize… Heck, we’ve been there!

That’s why we’ve decided to demo to these pros at HR Tech as users, not buyers.

After all, HR pros want to find out what teammates, employees and mentors really think – just like everyone else!  They also want regular, helpful feedback so they can learn and improve.   By demo-ing to them as users they’ll see that the can try Rypple for themselves or with their teams – for free and with almost no set-up. We’ve made it simple to experience Rypple with minimal effort and red tape.  The service we’ll demo is the exact service you can use, for free, today. No vaporware!

Being bold doesn’t mean being naive.  We know what the purchasing and change cycle are like in large organizations.  But, based on our experience, we believe it’s better for everyone if there are internal champions who have experienced real benefits from Rypple before the buying process starts. That’s what freemium does.

So, HR-tech-ers…. will you be bold and “turn the future into the past“?   Will you be bold and discover useful insights you would not have otherwise learned, so you can advance your own career and make your organization more productive?

We hope so.

See you at Cool New Technologies at  HR Tech!

*****

ps: We’re glad we’re not the only ones who think this way!

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Author Pic
September 23rd, 2009

Better Performance Reviews in 140 Characters: Why we Built Rypple

Posted by Daniel Debow, Co-CEO

0 comments

Tim Sackett, the EVP of HRU Technical Resources just wrote a great post “Better Performance Reviews in 140 Characters…” on FistFul of Talent.

Tim did some performance reviews recently and was struck by how much more clear, direct, and productive it would be if they were limited to 140 characters, like Twitter.

I believe I’ve uncovered the manager’s dream!  140 character Performance Review – 30 seconds and you’re out.   What an increase to productivity, to clarity – I mean how could you not be clear and concise in 140 characters.

We couldn’t agree more Tim!   Limiting characters forces people to be clear and concise. No fluff, just direct actionable feedback.

That’s why we built Rypple.  It takes your core insight of easy to create and concise feedback and builds on it to create a useful solution for improving insight, productivity, and performance.  And, like Twitter – it’s fun!

It takes seconds to give useful Rypple feedback.   And, because its so quick, people get more feedback, continuously, which helps people to develop.

We love it when smart people reaffirm why we built Rypple.  Thanks Tim!

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,